Mario Dandy Satriyo and Shane Lukas Continuation Trial Presents Crown Witnesses, Who Is He? Check out the Reviews
[ad_1]
BONSERNEWS.com – AGH’s son was presented by the public prosecutor (JPU) in the follow-up trial of the defendants Mario Dandy Satriyo and Shane Lukas at the South Jakarta District Court, on Tuesday (27/6/2023).
The public prosecutor presented AG as the crown witness in the case of persecution D. “Today, he will be cooperative to attend to the summons.
But unfortunately, our request for AG’s children to testify online is still being ignored by the Public Prosecutor and His Excellency the Examining Judge,” said AG’s attorney, Mangatta Toding Allo, Monday (26/6/2023) evening.
Also Read: A Man Named a Suspect Regarding the Case of Finding a Baby Skeleton, See the Full Review
AGH was present at around 09.30 WIB at the South Jakarta District Court. AGH was wearing a gray sweater and white shirt, looking down as he entered the South Jakarta District Court.
For information, Mario Dandy was charged with the first charge: Article 355 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code junto Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Subsidiary Criminal Code Article 353 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code junto Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code.
Or the second indictment: Article 76 c jucto article 50 paragraph 2 of Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection junto Article 55 paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code.
Also Read: Just starting to be active again on Instagram, Rebecca Kloper actually fled abroad, see the full explanation
While Shane Lukas was charged with the first charge: Article 355 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code Subsidiary Article 353 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code.
Or the second indictment: Article 355 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 56 of the 2nd Criminal Code Subsidiary Article 353 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 56 of the 2nd Criminal Code.
Or the third indictment: Article 76 C in conjunction with Article 80 paragraph (2) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.
From the first primary indictment, namely Article 355 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, both of them are practically threatened with imprisonment for 12 years.
“Severe maltreatment which is carried out with premeditation, is punishable by imprisonment for a maximum of twelve years,” as stated in 355 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code.
